PortfoliosLab logo
^NYA vs. MCD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ^NYA and MCD is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

^NYA vs. MCD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Composite (^NYA) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

^NYA:

0.41

MCD:

0.99

Sortino Ratio

^NYA:

0.74

MCD:

1.47

Omega Ratio

^NYA:

1.11

MCD:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

^NYA:

0.48

MCD:

1.17

Martin Ratio

^NYA:

1.99

MCD:

3.79

Ulcer Index

^NYA:

3.71%

MCD:

5.30%

Daily Std Dev

^NYA:

16.04%

MCD:

20.31%

Max Drawdown

^NYA:

-59.01%

MCD:

-73.62%

Current Drawdown

^NYA:

-4.70%

MCD:

-2.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^NYA achieves a 1.16% return, which is significantly lower than MCD's 8.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ^NYA has underperformed MCD with an annualized return of 5.61%, while MCD has yielded a comparatively higher 15.28% annualized return.


^NYA

YTD

1.16%

1M

6.03%

6M

-3.10%

1Y

6.37%

5Y*

11.86%

10Y*

5.61%

MCD

YTD

8.83%

1M

1.22%

6M

6.16%

1Y

16.85%

5Y*

14.86%

10Y*

15.28%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

^NYA vs. MCD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^NYA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^NYA is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^NYA is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^NYA is 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^NYA is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^NYA is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^NYA is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

MCD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MCD is 8181
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MCD is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MCD is 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MCD is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MCD is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MCD is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

^NYA vs. MCD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Composite (^NYA) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ^NYA Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the MCD Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^NYA and MCD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

^NYA vs. MCD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^NYA drawdown since its inception was -59.01%, smaller than the maximum MCD drawdown of -73.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^NYA and MCD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

^NYA vs. MCD - Volatility Comparison

NYSE Composite (^NYA) and McDonald's Corporation (MCD) have volatilities of 5.52% and 5.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...